Factual. Independent. Impartial.
Support AAP with a free or paid subscription
Climate
Max Aldred

Local environmentalists trump coal mine in High Court

The High Court has ruled a open-cut mine's expansion needs to take total emissions into account. (Dan Himbrechts/AAP PHOTOS)

Australia's highest court has upheld a first-of-its-kind climate change bid to overturn a major coal mine expansion.

MACH Energy sought to extend the life of Mount Pleasant coal mine in NSW by 22 years and nearly double its yearly output.

The state planning commission in 2022 approved the plans before local Hunter Valley residents launched a legal challenge.

Tony Lonergan and Wendy Wales
Muswellbrook residents Tony Lonergan and Wendy Wales challenged the mine's expansion. (PR IMAGE PHOTO)

The first bid to block the expansion was tossed before the NSW Court of Appeal unanimously ruled the approval unlawful in 2025.

The appeal court found planning authorities are legally required to consider the climate impact of Scope 3 emissions - caused when the coal is eventually burnt, including when exported overseas - on local communities.

MACH Energy took the finding to the High Court, which struck down the appeal on Wednesday morning.

"By majority, the High Court held the (planning) commission had failed to consider imposing conditions to minimise to the greatest extent practicable all greenhouse gas emissions, specifically 'scope three' emissions as required (by law)," the court said in a summary.

The Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group brought the case, led by Hunter resident Wendy Wales and represented by Johnson Legal.

The local leader previously told AAP she hoped the court would uphold the decision and “turn a super tanker around”.

On Wednesday she said the ruling acknowledged the risks to Australians posed by climate-influencing activities.

“This ruling acknowledges that many Australian communities have already suffered extreme weather devastation,” she said.

“Now the true and complete long-term costs of export coal on Australians, via the climate impact from burning that coal, must be considered."

License this article

Sign up to read this article for free
Choose between a free or paid subscription to AAP News
Start reading
Already a member? Sign in here
Top stories on AAP right now