Factual. Independent. Impartial.
We supply news, images and multimedia to hundreds of news outlets every day
First Nations
Andrew Brown and Paul Osborne

Electoral watchdog clarifies referendum legal advice

A political row is intensifying over the voting process for the voice referendum. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS)

Voters at the upcoming Indigenous voice referendum are being encouraged to clearly write 'yes' or 'no' on their ballot papers.

But while a tick will be considered a valid 'yes' vote, a cross will be considered an invalid vote and not counted.

The Australian Electoral Commission stated its firm, legally backed view on Friday, after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton argued a cross on the ballot paper should be considered a valid 'no' vote.

The commission said legal advice which had been accepted for three decades and over six referendum questions held that a cross on a ballot paper was open to interpretation as to whether it denoted approval or disapproval.

"Many people use it daily to indicate approval in checkboxes on forms," the commission said.

"The legal advice provides that for a single referendum question, a clear ‘tick’ should be counted as formal and a ‘cross’ should not."

The Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 includes "savings provisions" - the ability to count a vote where the instructions have not been followed but the voter’s intention is clear.

Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers said a clear 'yes' or 'no' should be written on the ballot paper and it was expected more than 99 per cent of voters would do so.

In the 1999 referendum just 0.86 per cent of votes were informal.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said a cross on a ballot paper should count as a valid 'no' vote.

"Australians want to see a free vote, fair vote, in a democratic society. It doesn't matter whether you're a 'yes' or a 'no', the question is whether or not it's a fair process," he told Nine's Today program.

It's emerged that Mr Dutton himself used an 'x' multiple times on his 2022 federal election candidate qualification form to denote 'yes', 'no' and 'not applicable' responses.

Labor national president Wayne Swan said the criticism was an attempt to cast a shadow over the work of the electoral commission and the referendum result.

"This is just the 'no' case out there using the electoral system to try to discredit the voice and in doing so, doing what many other right-wing parties around the world are doing, discrediting basic electoral arrangements," Mr Swan said.

"It is appalling, I'm disgusted by their behaviour."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will announce the date for the referendum on Wednesday, with October 14 widely expected to be confirmed.

The poll will determine whether an Indigenous voice will be enshrined in the constitution to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the first people of Australia.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said the commission should be applauded for its efforts.

"The AEC should be congratulated for having more Aboriginal people on the (electoral) roll than ever before in our history and working closely and collaboratively with people that want to see this as a fair and equitable referendum," she said.

License this article

Sign up to read this article
Get your dose of factual, independent and impartial news
Already a member? Sign in here
Top stories on AAP right now