Factual. Independent. Impartial.
Support AAP with a free or paid subscription
Courts
Lloyd Jones

Native title holders hail landmark water decision

Traditional Owners were denied procedural fairness when a 30-year groundwater licence was awarded. (PR IMAGE PHOTO)

A massive water allocation granted for free to a cattle station to grow fruit and vegetables in the desert has been quashed in a High Court appeal.

The Mpwerempwer Aboriginal Corporation challenged whether the Northern Territory government lawfully granted the decades-long water licence.

Indigenous leaders have hailed the ruling as landmark moment for Indigenous water rights in Australia.

The licence authorised Fortune Agribusiness to extract 40 gigalitres of groundwater at Singleton Station, north of Alice Springs, every year for 30 years - equal to draining Sydney Harbour twice.

Traditional Owners argued the project threatened sacred sites, cultural survival and a fragile desert water system.

Water tank
The court ruled the minister could not be satisfied that such special circumstances existed. (Dan Peled/AAP PHOTOS)

That argument failed in the NT Supreme Court and the territory's Court of Appeal.

The NT government said the courts had already correctly identified the law did not impose an obligation on a government minister to consider the impact on Aboriginal cultural values.

But the High Court on Wednesday ordered the water licence to be quashed, referring the water licence application back to NT decision makers, who will have to consider environmental approvals.

The court ruled the relevant NT minister did not address special circumstances to justify the water licence for an extended period of 30 years.

It ruled the minister also did not form a "state of satisfaction" that such special circumstances existed.

The decision "contravened express and implied limitations on the decision-making authority conferred on the delegate minister," the court ruled.

Lia Finocchiaro
The government of Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro unsuccessfully defended the decision. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS)

The making of the decision should have included the Aboriginal corporation being given notice of proposed conditions and an opportunity to be heard in a written submission.

However it ruled it was given "no such notice and no such opportunity".

The Mpwerempwer Aboriginal Corporation argued the water licence risked permanently damaging an ancient aquifer, at least 40 groundwater-dependent sacred sites and community water supplies.

The Central Land Council said the ruling represented a landmark moment for Indigenous water rights in Australia and nullified what was the largest groundwater licence ever granted in the NT.

“That water is a Dreaming. It's got a meaning for us and our Country," said native title holder Valerie Curtis in a statement.

"That's why it was really important for us to keep fighting and trying to find a balance there between the farm and us mob as traditional owners living on the country."

If Fortune Agribusiness wanted to proceed it would need to wait for the NT Environment Protection Authority to complete an environmental impact assessment before the NT government reconsidered the licence.

On its website, it says FortuneAgri is committed to engaging with native title holders and the Central Land Council about all aspects of the project, to provide transparency, address concerns and minimise potential issues.

Sign up to read this article for free
Choose between a free or paid subscription to AAP News
Start reading
Already a member? Sign in here
Top stories on AAP right now