Factual. Independent. Impartial.
Support AAP with a free or paid subscription
General
Cassandra Morgan

Taxpayers footed bill for public servants' funerals

The public sector organisation spent at least $30,000 on funeral and memorial expenses for staff. (Steven Saphore/AAP PHOTOS)

Taxpayers footed the bill for public servants' funeral costs after one organisation in Victoria doled out at least $30,000 to memorialise staff. 

The organisation was bound by the Victorian Public Sector Commission's rules around gift giving, which stated employees could be given "token offers" worth under $50.

Despite that, it bought crystal bowls costing almost $500 each as long service awards and gave an executive an antique hat costing more than $150 as a leaving present, Victoria's integrity watchdog has revealed.

The public sector organisation, which the watchdog did not name, footed the bill for thousands of dollars worth of traffic fines, which should have been paid by staff.

It also spent at least $30,000 of public money on funeral and memorial costs for staff who died in circumstances unrelated to their work. 

Just how much was spent on funerals was impossible to know given not all the organisation's invoices were accurately recorded, the Victorian Ombudsman found.

The watchdog, which on Wednesday revealed the practice in a report about misconduct in public organisations, said workers believed they were justified in how they spent public money.

One director at the organisation said paying for staff members' funeral costs was part of the culture, although another senior financial worker said: "I don't think the public sector should pay for funerals."

In response to recommendations by the ombudsman, the organisation ultimately reviewed its policies and processes, starting monthly reconciliations of credit card purchases to check transactions were business-related.

The organisation's gifting policy also now states when gifts are appropriate and how much can be spent.

The case was just one example of misconduct detailed in the ombudsman's report.

"Conflicts of interest, favouritism, and misuse of public funds continue to feature, as they have in previous Ombudsman reports," Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass said. 

"But the stories are different, and each holds valuable lessons from which others can learn."

The case of the organisation paying for funeral costs showed policies needed to be clear and comprehensive, and organisations needed to carefully consider whether gifts were in the public interest, Ms Glass said.

In another example of misconduct detailed in the report, a cemetery trust's chair colluded with a grave digger to divert half the fees for grave digging work to the chair's private business.

Most of the graves the trust paid the grave digger for were instead dug by the chair, who reaped $5600 from the scheme.

Then there was a manager at a government department who took the equivalent of more than 40 days off without telling their bosses.

Instead, they pretended they went to an off-site meeting. Another manager at a different government organisation botched a recruitment process to get their close friend a public service job.

The watchdog fielded almost 100 allegations about conflicts of interest, favouritism or discrimination in 2021/22, along with 55 claims about the misuse of authority, position or power.

It also received almost 50 complaints about the misuse of resources and public information or materials.

License this article

Sign up to read this article for free
Choose between a free or paid subscription to AAP News
Start reading
Already a member? Sign in here
Top stories on AAP right now